Canon Law

Notes, Commentary, Papers and Discussion

User Tools

Site Tools


rcri.legacy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
rcri.legacy [2019/09/30 12:58] – [One solution] amycsjrcri.legacy [2020/01/09 14:14] – [Legacy] amycsj
Line 10: Line 10:
   * 75-90% of institutes will cease in the coming decades - 300-350 institutes   * 75-90% of institutes will cease in the coming decades - 300-350 institutes
 ===== One solution ===== ===== One solution =====
-{{ :viability.png?400|}} 
   * //Perfectae caritatis ('65)// #21 - recommended merger and affiliation for declining institutes   * //Perfectae caritatis ('65)// #21 - recommended merger and affiliation for declining institutes
   * Under this model, remaining institutes could have 5-10 institutes merging or affiliating   * Under this model, remaining institutes could have 5-10 institutes merging or affiliating
Line 19: Line 18:
   * the //lack of candidates// over a period of several years,    * the //lack of candidates// over a period of several years, 
   * the //advanced age// of the majority of its members.   * the //advanced age// of the majority of its members.
 +  * {{ :viability.png?400|  }}
 +
 ===== Particular Challenges ===== ===== Particular Challenges =====
   * Providing //ongoing leadership// for the institute.   * Providing //ongoing leadership// for the institute.
Line 147: Line 148:
     * Legacy clause in a retirement trust     * Legacy clause in a retirement trust
     * Legacy trust     * Legacy trust
 +===== Planning =====
 +  - What assets does the group have, financial, real estate, trusts, etc? And approximate value.
 +  - What is the current purpose or use of those assets?
 +  - What would be the legacy use of those assets? And what might the timeline look like?
 +  - What is the best way to ensure that the assets are used for the current purpose, then dedicated to the legacy purpose?
 +  * Since there is quite a variation in those answers, the way of moving forward could be quite different. 
 +
 +
 +|                ^ Asset         ^ Value      ^ Use/Purpose  ^ Legacy     ^
 +^ Sisters Inc    | Land          | $$$        | Sisters      |            |
 +^ Sisters Inc    | Land          | $$$        | Ministry      |            |
 +^ Sisters Inc    | Investments | $$$                       |
 +^ Trust    |           | $$$        | Sisters       |
 +^ Retirement Facility    |           | $$$        | Sisters       |
 +^ Ministry    |           | $$$        | Ministry       |
 +
 +
 ===== Take Aways ===== ===== Take Aways =====
   * Plan ahead   * Plan ahead
Line 155: Line 173:
  
 ===== Bibliography ===== ===== Bibliography =====
-Hereford, Amy. //Beyond the Crossroads: Religious Life in the 21st Century.// New York: Orbis Books, 2019.+Hereford, Amy. [[https://www.amazon.com/dp/1626983321/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_sDMKDbSKATCGJ |Beyond the Crossroads: Religious Life in the 21st Century.]] New York: Orbis Books, 2019.
  
 ———. “Canon 580: Aggregation and Covenants.” //Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions,// 2012, 83–86. ———. “Canon 580: Aggregation and Covenants.” //Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions,// 2012, 83–86.
Line 167: Line 185:
 ———. “Charitable Trusts Twenty Five Years Later.” //Legal Bulletin// 73 (2002): 17–37. ———. “Charitable Trusts Twenty Five Years Later.” //Legal Bulletin// 73 (2002): 17–37.
  
-———. “Congregational Legacy Trust.” //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 4 (2017): 1–4.+———. [[http://www.ahereford.org/subscription/post/newsletter74|“Congregational Legacy Trust.”]] //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 4 (2017): 1–4.
  
-———. “Ministerial Public Juridic Person.” //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 3 (2017): 1–4.+———. [[http://www.ahereford.org/subscription/post/newsletter73|“Ministerial Public Juridic Person.”]] //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 3 (2017): 1–4.
  
-———. Navigating Change: The Role of Law in the Life-Cycle of a Religious Institute. St. Louis, MO: Religious Life Project, 2015.+———. [[https://www.amazon.com/dp/1517028469/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_.BMKDb1NW031V |Navigating Change]]: The Role of Law in the Life-Cycle of a Religious Institute. St. Louis, MO: Religious Life Project, 2015.
  
 ———. “Practical Guidelines for Aging Religious Institutes.” In //RCRI Bulletin//, 4–20. Silver Spring, MD: RCRI, 2015. ———. “Practical Guidelines for Aging Religious Institutes.” In //RCRI Bulletin//, 4–20. Silver Spring, MD: RCRI, 2015.
  
-———. “Transitioning Leadership.” //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 2 (2017): 1–4.+———. [[http://www.ahereford.org/subscription/post/newsletter72 |“Transitioning Leadership.”]] //RLC Newsletter// 17, no. 2 (2017): 1–4.
  
 ———. “Transitioning Sponsorship.” //RCRI Bulletin// 17 (2017): 5–18. ———. “Transitioning Sponsorship.” //RCRI Bulletin// 17 (2017): 5–18.
  
 [[http://www.ahereford.org/subscription|Sign up for RLC Newsletter (Religious Law and Consultation).]] [[http://www.ahereford.org/subscription|Sign up for RLC Newsletter (Religious Law and Consultation).]]
/users/ahereford.org/htdocs/canonlaw/data/pages/rcri.legacy.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/10 12:15 by amycsj