rcri.legacy
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
rcri.legacy [2019/09/30 12:58] – [One solution] amycsj | rcri.legacy [2020/01/09 14:14] – [Legacy] amycsj | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* 75-90% of institutes will cease in the coming decades - 300-350 institutes | * 75-90% of institutes will cease in the coming decades - 300-350 institutes | ||
===== One solution ===== | ===== One solution ===== | ||
- | {{ : | ||
* //Perfectae caritatis (' | * //Perfectae caritatis (' | ||
* Under this model, remaining institutes could have 5-10 institutes merging or affiliating | * Under this model, remaining institutes could have 5-10 institutes merging or affiliating | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
* the //lack of candidates// | * the //lack of candidates// | ||
* the //advanced age// of the majority of its members. | * the //advanced age// of the majority of its members. | ||
+ | * {{ : | ||
+ | |||
===== Particular Challenges ===== | ===== Particular Challenges ===== | ||
* Providing //ongoing leadership// | * Providing //ongoing leadership// | ||
Line 147: | Line 148: | ||
* Legacy clause in a retirement trust | * Legacy clause in a retirement trust | ||
* Legacy trust | * Legacy trust | ||
+ | ===== Planning ===== | ||
+ | - What assets does the group have, financial, real estate, trusts, etc? And approximate value. | ||
+ | - What is the current purpose or use of those assets? | ||
+ | - What would be the legacy use of those assets? And what might the timeline look like? | ||
+ | - What is the best way to ensure that the assets are used for the current purpose, then dedicated to the legacy purpose? | ||
+ | * Since there is quite a variation in those answers, the way of moving forward could be quite different. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | | ^ Asset ^ Value ^ Use/ | ||
+ | ^ Sisters Inc | Land | $$$ | Sisters | ||
+ | ^ Sisters Inc | Land | $$$ | Ministry | ||
+ | ^ Sisters Inc | Investments | $$$ | ||
+ | ^ Trust | | $$$ | Sisters | ||
+ | ^ Retirement Facility | ||
+ | ^ Ministry | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Take Aways ===== | ===== Take Aways ===== | ||
* Plan ahead | * Plan ahead | ||
Line 155: | Line 173: | ||
===== Bibliography ===== | ===== Bibliography ===== | ||
- | Hereford, Amy. //Beyond the Crossroads: Religious Life in the 21st Century.// New York: Orbis Books, 2019. | + | Hereford, Amy. [[https://www.amazon.com/ |
———. “Canon 580: Aggregation and Covenants.” //Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions,// 2012, 83–86. | ———. “Canon 580: Aggregation and Covenants.” //Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions,// 2012, 83–86. | ||
Line 167: | Line 185: | ||
———. “Charitable Trusts Twenty Five Years Later.” //Legal Bulletin// 73 (2002): 17–37. | ———. “Charitable Trusts Twenty Five Years Later.” //Legal Bulletin// 73 (2002): 17–37. | ||
- | ———. “Congregational Legacy Trust.” //RLC Newsletter// | + | ———. |
- | ———. “Ministerial Public Juridic Person.” //RLC Newsletter// | + | ———. |
- | ———. Navigating Change: The Role of Law in the Life-Cycle of a Religious Institute. St. Louis, MO: Religious Life Project, 2015. | + | ———. |
———. “Practical Guidelines for Aging Religious Institutes.” In //RCRI Bulletin//, 4–20. Silver Spring, MD: RCRI, 2015. | ———. “Practical Guidelines for Aging Religious Institutes.” In //RCRI Bulletin//, 4–20. Silver Spring, MD: RCRI, 2015. | ||
- | ———. “Transitioning Leadership.” //RLC Newsletter// | + | ———. |
———. “Transitioning Sponsorship.” //RCRI Bulletin// 17 (2017): 5–18. | ———. “Transitioning Sponsorship.” //RCRI Bulletin// 17 (2017): 5–18. | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// |
/users/ahereford.org/htdocs/canonlaw/data/pages/rcri.legacy.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/10 12:15 by amycsj